01
重點摘要

Executive Summary / Lead

The Commission study indicates that deployment is not the end of conformity. Once a high-risk AI system operates, its data, version, users, integrations and intended purpose may change, weakening the representativeness of earlier evidence.

02
企業與產業背景

Company & Industry Context

Providers, integrators and deployers control different parts of the AI lifecycle. Conventional governance concentrates classification, risk assessment, technical documentation and conformity decisions before release, followed by post-market monitoring.

03
挑戰與重要性

Challenge / Why It Matters

The risk is not limited to system failure. Records may remain available while no longer describing the operating system. Distributed responsibility and incremental modifications make governance boundaries and reassessment duties harder to determine.

04
行動、方案與執行

Action / Solution / Implementation

A continuous evidence system should bind system versions, purposes, data, responsible actors and governance boundaries. When material change occurs, it should identify which evidence remains valid, which needs supplementation and which requires reassessment.

05
證據、成果與影響

Evidence / Results / Impact

The study draws on 544 consultation responses, three expert workshops with 166 recorded participations and a follow-up survey. Intended purpose, role allocation, value-chain information and substantial modification repeatedly emerged as implementation concerns.

06
產業與制度意涵

Industry & Institutional Implications

Conformity therefore becomes a maintained condition rather than a one-time conclusion. Monitoring may detect change, but governance must also determine boundary shifts, responsibility and whether previous evidence still supports institutional reliance.

07
SNN 編輯與證據基礎設施觀點

SNN Editorial / Evidence Infrastructure Perspective

SNN editorial analysis: Evidence Decay and the Continuous Evidence System are EMJ.LIFE institutional interpretations, not legal conclusions of the European Commission. Their value is the distinction between evidence that exists and evidence that remains valid.

08
未來展望

Future Outlook

Future high-risk AI governance will depend on evidence flowing back from deployment, updates, incidents and corrective actions. Human review should verify the official study, the AI Act scope and the responsibilities assigned to each actor.