歐洲議會環境委員會支持放寬新車減碳目標，協商立場仍待全院表決

ESG Today於11月5日報導，歐洲議會環境委員會ENVI在4日支持調整新乘用車與廂型車的二氧化碳減排要求，表決結果為48票贊成、30票反對。報導指出，委員會支持把2035年新乘用車的減排目標由現行100%調整為87.5%。這仍是委員會立場，不能視為歐盟已完成修法。

ESG Today reported on 5 November that the European Parliament’s ENVI committee had supported changes to CO2 requirements for new cars and vans a day earlier, by 48 votes to 30. Its report describes an 87.5% reduction target for new passenger cars in 2035, compared with the existing 100% target. A committee position is a step in legislation, not evidence that the EU has completed an amendment.

汽車減碳規則直接影響整車廠的產品組合、車型研發及供應商需求。理事會2023年通過的規則，將2035年新乘用車與新廂型車的車隊目標設為相對2021年減少100%。執委會於2025年12月提出汽車產業套案，啟動進一步檢討；既有法規、執委會提案與議會委員會立場屬不同程序層次。

Car CO2 rules shape manufacturers’ product portfolios, development plans and supplier demand. The rules adopted by the Council in 2023 set a 100% reduction target for the new-car and new-van fleets from 2035 against the 2021 reference. The Commission presented an automotive package in December 2025 to pursue further changes. Existing legislation, a Commission proposal and a parliamentary committee position represent different procedural stages.

委員會支持較有彈性的路徑，但規則調整仍牽涉氣候目標、產業投資及市場需求之間的取捨。企業若把政策協商訊號直接換成已生效的採購規格，可能在車型認證、材料選擇及長約談判中產生錯配。不同年份、車種與計算方式也不能只憑單一減排百分比比較。

The committee favours greater flexibility, while the debate continues to balance climate objectives, industrial investment and market conditions. Treating a negotiation signal as an effective purchasing specification can misalign vehicle approval, material selection and long-term contracts. Targets for different years, vehicle classes and accounting mechanisms also cannot be compared through a single percentage alone.

依ESG Today的報導，委員會方案涉及歐盟產低碳鋼材的抵計安排，以及對特定電動車的加權計算誘因。這些內容仍須經後續立法程序確定。全院預計於12月就與成員國協商的立場表決，企業應保留每個階段的文本版本，而不是把委員會通過當成所有細節已定案。

According to ESG Today, the committee approach includes treatment of EU-made low-carbon steel and additional weighting for certain electric vehicles. These provisions remain subject to subsequent legislative steps. A plenary vote on Parliament’s negotiating position is expected in December. Businesses should retain the text applicable to each stage rather than treating committee approval as a final settlement of all details.

歐洲汽車製造商協會ACEA在11月4日的自身聲明中確認ENVI已表決，並認為乘用車新增彈性的範圍與期間仍不足。這是與歐盟機構法律上分開的產業協會立場，具有直接利害關係，並非對政策環境效益的中立認證。其回應可核對程序進展，但不能單獨證明每項數值或最終法律結果。

In its own 4 November statement, ACEA confirmed the ENVI vote and argued that the additional flexibility for passenger cars remained too limited in scope and duration. The association is legally distinct from EU institutions and represents vehicle manufacturers with a direct stake in the outcome. Its response corroborates procedural progress, but it is not neutral certification of environmental benefits or independent proof of every proposed numerical provision.

產業判讀的重點，是把長期產品投資與可更新的制度假設分開管理。整車廠與材料供應商仍須依適用法規履行當期要求，同時追蹤車型、鋼材及排放計算誘因的協商變化。政策彈性不等於所有技術的減排效果相同，也不等於任何一種材料已自動取得認列資格。

The practical issue is to manage long-lived product investments separately from updateable regulatory assumptions. Manufacturers and material suppliers still need to meet currently applicable requirements while monitoring negotiations over vehicles, steel and emissions-accounting incentives. Policy flexibility neither makes all technologies equally effective nor automatically qualifies a material for regulatory recognition.

SNN編輯分析與建議：歐盟汽車排放規則若依後續協商調整，可能透過歐洲整車廠的車型採購規格與材料排放資料要求，傳導至台灣車用零組件業務團隊及台灣汽車供應鏈碳資料團隊，具體影響跨境車型採購規格調整與車用材料排放資料交付。這是依歐洲客戶曝險而成立的條件式台灣傳導，不表示委員會立場已成台灣義務。揭露前證據基礎設施應連接ENVI委員會立場紀錄、現行2035目標版本、客戶車型需求表、低碳鋼材規格與產地證明、零組件排放資料包、採購合約變更單及全院授權與協商時程表。第一，台灣車用零組件業務團隊應在歐洲客戶新車型詢價時，將客戶車型需求表與現行2035目標版本核對，記錄尚待立法的假設。第二，台灣汽車供應鏈碳資料團隊應在鋼材替換或季度資料交付前，核對低碳鋼材規格與產地證明及零組件排放資料包，保留材料來源和計算版本。第三，歐洲整車廠法遵團隊應在全院表決或協商文本發布時，對照ENVI委員會立場紀錄與全院授權與協商時程表，確認是否需要採購合約變更單。上述為SNN編輯建議，不是已獲認證的材料資格、減排成果或法律適用結論。

SNN editorial analysis and recommendations: If subsequent negotiations change EU car CO2 rules, European vehicle manufacturers may transmit the changes through vehicle-model procurement specifications and material-emissions information requests, affecting Taiwan automotive-component sales teams and Taiwan automotive supply-chain carbon-data teams through cross-border vehicle-model procurement changes and automotive-material emissions evidence delivery. This conditional Taiwan transmission depends on actual European customer exposure and does not turn a committee position into a Taiwan legal duty. Pre-Disclosure Evidence Infrastructure should connect the ENVI committee-position record, current 2035 target version, customer vehicle-model requirement sheet, low-carbon steel specification and origin record, component-emissions data pack, procurement-contract change order and plenary-mandate and negotiation timetable. First, Taiwan automotive-component sales teams should compare the customer vehicle-model requirement sheet with the current 2035 target version when a European customer requests a new-model quotation, recording assumptions still subject to legislation. Second, Taiwan automotive supply-chain carbon-data teams must reconcile the low-carbon steel specification and origin record with the component-emissions data pack before material substitution or quarterly delivery, retaining provenance and calculation versions. Third, European vehicle-manufacturer compliance teams should compare the ENVI committee-position record with the plenary-mandate and negotiation timetable when a plenary vote or negotiation text is issued, deciding whether to authorise a procurement-contract change order. These are SNN editorial recommendations, not certified material eligibility, measured emissions outcomes or a legal-compliance conclusion.

後續觀察點包括全院授權、成員國協商及正式修正文本。若最終內容改變，企業需把生效與適用時間、車種界定及計算方法一起更新。現階段可先盤點客戶需求與資料責任，避免以協商中的方向替代仍然適用的規則。

Next milestones include a plenary mandate, negotiations with member states and the formal amending text. Any final change requires businesses to update effective and application dates alongside vehicle definitions and calculation methods. Mapping customer requirements and data ownership now can support readiness without replacing rules that remain applicable.